You are here...

 Building Bridges Initiative Cluster Evaluation:
Nonprofit Management Alumni Survey Report
(Part 3 of 3)

March 2002

R. Sam Larson, Ph.D
Applied Research
601 Abbott Rd.
P.O. Box 4434
E. Lansing, MI  48826
E-Mail:  larsonrs@msu.edu

Part 1

  • Executive Summary

  • Introduction

  • The BBI Survey of Nonprofit Management Alumni

  • Profile of Students

Part 2

  • Alumni Assessment of Course Topics’ Importance

  • Table 1.  Alumni Assessment of Nonprofit Management Course Topics

  • Choosing a Graduate Nonprofit Management Program

  • Table 2: Time 1 and Time 2 Mean Score Ranking of Course Topics

  • Connecting Practice and Knowledge

  • Table 3: Alumni Satisfaction with Nonprofit Management Programs  

Part 3

 

The Benefits of Nonprofit Management Education

In the student survey, we asked respondents why they were continuing their education.   Students told us that the most important reasons for continuing their education were personal development, skill acquisition, and new employment opportunities.  Students said they were pursuing their educational program to develop the “skills and knowledge to do my job well,” for a “desire to learn theory after years of practice,” out of a “general desire at mid-career to ‘re-engage’ academically,” “to put sound theoretical and research backgrounds together with pragmatic skills,” and because they “need new skills and ideas and enthusiasm.”

As a follow-up to this question, we asked alumni to indicate how their management skills changed as a result of attending their nonprofit management program:

  • Over three-quarters (79%) of alumni respondents said they were able to make a greater contribution to their organizations,

  • 76 percent had more confidence in their management abilities, and

  • 64 percent are now better able to apply theory to practice. 

Alumni gave many examples of how they use their new management skills.  Many of their responses refer to improved strategic planning and human resource skills, but they include a full range of management activities – from financial management to writing to fund raising to being a more effective board member.  A few of their responses illustrate the type of management and client service improvements they associate with their academic experience:

The management, human resources, and ethics courses have provided me with managerial knowledge and leadership skills (e.g. knowing the language, rules, and ethics of issues) to become an accountable leader.

 

I have used my skills to redefine my previous job and I received a promotion and raise.  Additionally, I have reached more clients and helped them more effectively than before.

 

I have been able to advise our management team on legal issues surrounding board activities and 501(c)3 tax exempt status that they were not aware of.

 

I am now on the Board of Directors of an NPO and have used fundraising and budgeting information to educate other board members.

 

In the budget process for the upcoming fiscal year, I am now called upon to set budget goals and fundraising goals because of my coursework.

 

It is not a “management” skill per se, but my greater understanding of the goals of the nonprofit sector and the motivators behind philanthropy has given me greater depth and strength of purpose to my “management” decisions.

Alumni frequently use their new management skills on-the-job.  Nearly half (46%) said they apply their new knowledge and skills on a daily basis and 27 percent indicate they do so once or twice a week.

Another type of management skills is networking – connecting with other leaders in the nonprofit world.  Class cohorts can become a network, particularly if the students or alumni remain in the same geographic region.  About half (47%) of alumni survey respondents indicated that they saw their classmates as a new cohort of nonprofit professionals that they could contact with management and leadership questions.  Alumni may also see the university as part of their extended network with 43 percent saying that were now better able to access university resources and personnel.

With the development of new skills and a greater sense of efficacy, alumni may begin to consider, or re-consider, their career plans. Table 4 identifies the types of career changes alumni have experienced or anticipate as a result of attending a nonprofit management academic program.

     Table 4:  Alumni Career Changes

How have your career plans changed as a result of attending a nonprofit management academic program?

 

I am aware of new career options.

55%

I am more likely to receive, or have already received, an increase in my income.

52%

 

I am clearer about my career direction.

51%

I am more likely to assume, or have already assumed, a leadership role in a nonprofit organization.

51%

 

I am more likely to be, or have already been, promoted within my organization.

33%

 

I have changed careers.

13%

Top

When asked to give an example of how their academic programs affected their career plans nearly 80 percent of the alumni gave an example.  Most of their comments reflect new opportunities – they are moving-up in their organizations, are aware of new careers and areas of work, and have moved to new organizations or agencies.  Several of the over 100 comments exemplify the enthusiasm apparent in so many of the responses:

Attending this program has launched my career.

I moved from executive assistant to researching charities – a more professional job.

 

The proposal writing class got me interested in grant writing…. It has opened up new opportunities for my career.

 

The director position of my organization may become available and I would be a logical person to assume the role because of my education.

The program has helped me to establish contacts for potential job change opportunities in the nonprofit sector.

If anything, my education has made career planning very unclear, which I experience as a very positive opportunity to think and stretch “beyond the box”.

 

I now expect to work in management rather than direct service in the nonprofit sector. My program has provided me with the skills to be confident about assuming a management position.

 

The program has opened new possibilities – perhaps in policy research.

 

I now have a clear idea of my career direction in the nonprofit sector and know my next career steps.

 

I have considered returning to academia to more perfectly bridge the chasm between theory and practice in philanthropic/non-profit studies.

An unintended consequence of an increase in management skills and efficacy may be alumni dissatisfaction with their current work.  Only 36 percent of alumni said that as a result of attending their program they found their work more satisfying.  Perhaps alumni would like more opportunities to apply their skills. This possibility seems reasonable given that about one-quarter (27%) of the alumni applied their new skills only monthly or less.  It is possible that alumni who do not find their work more satisfying may feel less challenged – their new skills may be underutilized.  It is also possible that the majority of alumni respondents were satisfied with their jobs prior to enrolling in the program and that additional education did not increase or decrease an already high level of satisfaction.

How have the management capacities of alumni improved as a result of their educational program?

Alumni have gained new management skills in a range of areas including strategic planning, human resource skills, financial management, and fund raising.  Alumni apply these skills in their workplaces on a regular basis.  Underlying these new skills – and new professional networks with cohorts – is a greater sense of efficacy.  Alumni are more confident in their management skills, see themselves as making a greater contribution to their organizations, and are better able to apply theory to practice.

Simply put, alumni have improved their management skills and are able to link what they learn in the classroom with the work they perform in their organizations.  

Top

Conclusion  

This paper represents the second phase of a two-phase project.  The project started with a survey completed by students enrolled in nonprofit management programs affiliated with the Building Bridges Initiative.  The purpose of that survey was to help us identify why students choose to continue their education, why and how they chose nonprofit programs, and how satisfied they are with various dimensions of their academic programs.  This paper reports on the findings from the second part of this project.  It followed a subset of students twelve-to-eighteen months  later to assess their opinions of programs but this time as alumni. This paper also focuses on skills alumni have gained and how their professional lives have changed as a result of their education. 

The relative importance of course topics remained somewhat constant from the student survey to the alumni survey.  Some courses may be more important when one is an alum – such as fundraising and development, governance, and human resources.  Courses rating low in the student survey in importance for managing and leading a nonprofit – advocacy, information systems, economic and market issues, quantitative analysis, and international issues – were rated even lower in the alumni survey.  Taken together, these findings suggest that alumni want (and need) to develop skills closely aligned with the pragmatic, day-to-day management and leading of an organization. 

When alumni were looking for an academic program, they were looking for a program from a reputable institution that focused on nonprofits and connected university knowledge with practice knowledge.  Alumni are satisfied with their decisions, and nearly all would make the same decision again.  However, the active connections between the university program and the field of practice – connections such as collaborative opportunities for nonprofit leaders and students, networking opportunities for students and alumni, links between the program and nonprofit organizations, and connections between research and practice – are areas in need of more attention.  Admittedly, these are difficult connections to make and maintain. It may take several more years before programs can engage in this type of outreach.

Perhaps the most important finding in this study is the ample evidence that alumni have garnered new skills and are thinking and acting differently because of these skills.  Alumni are better able to contribute to their organizations, are more confident in their management abilities, and are better able to apply theory to practice.  Alumni tended to talk about new or improved skills in strategic planning, human resources, and several financial domains (fundraising, budgeting, proposal writing).  And alumni use these skills frequently – nearly half apply them on a daily basis and about one-quarter do so once or twice a week.  Finally, alumni are thinking anew about their career options and most like what they see.  It is quite likely that programs such as those supported by the BBI are an important means to curtail the movement of talented individuals out of the nonprofit sector.  That is, these programs may be a retention intervention – helping the nonprofit sector to develop and keep bright and motivated leaders.

Top

References

Larson, R. S. & Long, R.F.  (1998).  Nonprofit management academic centers: Moving from the periphery.  Paper presented at the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Seattle, Washington.

Larson, R. S. & Long, R. F.  (2000).  Academic centers: Moving beyond the periphery.  Journal of Public Service and Outreach 5(2), 39-47.

Mirabella, R. & Wish, N.  (2000).  Nonprofit management education: Summary of research on graduate degree programs.  Paper presented at the International Association for Third Sector Research, Dublin, Ireland. 

National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration. (2000). Task group report on guidelines for graduate professional education in nonprofit organizations, management and leadership.  [On-line].  Available:  http://www.naspaa.org/guidelines/guide_npft.htm

O'Neill, M. and Young, D.R. (Eds.).  (1988).  Educating managers of nonprofit organizations. New York, NY: Praeger.

O’Neill, M. & Fletcher, K.  (Eds.).  (1998).  Nonprofit management education: U.S. and world perspectives.  Westport, CT: Praeger.

Wish, N. & Mirabella, R.  (1998a).  Nonprofit management education: Current offerings and practices in university-based programs.  In M. O’Neill and K. Fletcher (Eds.), Nonprofit management education: U.S. and world perspectives, (pp. 13-22).  Westport, CT: Praeger.

Wish, N. & Mirabella, R.  (1998b).  Curricular variations in nonprofit management graduate programs.  Nonprofit management and leadership  9(1), 99-109.

Index Top