![]() |
![]() |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FOR RELEASE APRIL 11, 2002: CONTACTS:
Kellogg Foundation Follow-Up Study: Battle Creek, Michigan,
April 11, 2002
- A new study, released by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, reveals
significant information about the importance of and satisfaction with
the coursework, community connections and utility of university-based
nonprofit management education programs, as related by the
alumni-practitioners involved in the program. This
alumni study follows on the heels of a study of nonprofit management
students, conducted by Applied Research (East Lansing, Michigan) in 2000
– 2001. The first study provided new information about the
demographics and motivations of nonprofit management students. This
follow-up study, conducted by Applied Research in 2001 - 2002, surveyed
160 of the original respondents who have now completed or nearly
completed their course of study in certificate or master’s programs in
nonprofit management education at six universities across the country.
The six universities are part of a larger Kellogg Foundation
initiative entitled ‘Building Bridges between Practice and Knowledge
in Nonprofit Management Education.’
Both studies are available online at http://www.centerpointinstitute.org/bridges/papersreports/papers.htm.
The
follow-up survey asked the respondents to assess their educational
experience from an alumni perspective in three general areas: ·
Course topic importance
or the extent to which nonprofit courses reflect the interests and needs
of the practitioner, ·
Connection of practice and
knowledge or the quality and strength of the links among the
university, the nonprofit community and the students, and ·
Benefits of nonprofit
management education or how their management skills have changed as
a result of their education. The
accompanying table compares responses from Time 1 (as students) and Time
2 (as alumni). There is
little movement in the relative ranking of courses.
The same five to six courses ranked highest and lowest at Time 1
were also ranked highest and lowest at Time 2, suggesting, as Applied
Research Director R. Sam Larson, Ph.D., says, “respondents still
preferred courses that could immediately help them in the day-to-day
operation of a nonprofit such as fundraising and development,
governance, and proposal writing, and were less concerned with courses
like government-nonprofit relations, international issues or nonprofit
history.” The value of
individual courses fluctuated somewhat between Time 1 and Time 2 but the
overall trend held. There
were also few differences among alumni respondents based on
socio-demographic information. Larson
says, “Simply put, alumni – regardless of their degree type, the
university they attended, their age, or how long they have worked –
tend to value the same course topics and these topics typically focus on
the internal day-to-day management of nonprofit organizations.” Time
1 and Time 2 Mean Score Ranking of Course Topics
Note: “*” indicates a mean score change was statistically
significant at
These
research findings are published in a paper entitled “Building
Bridges Initiative Cluster ----- The
Building Bridges Initiative (BBI), now in its fifth and final year,
supports the development of comprehensive educational programs for
managers and leaders in nonprofit and public organizations.
There are 19 BBI projects based in the United States and eight
BBI programs in Latin America and the Caribbean.
The ultimate goal of the Building Bridges Initiative is to raise
the quality of life in communities by enabling nonprofit managers
serving those communities to be more effective through increased
opportunities for training and education, as well as greater relevance
of nonprofit management curricula in higher education.
Grantees have designed projects and programs to conduct research,
train future nonprofit leaders, or improve knowledge about nonprofit
management practices. The
W. K. Kellogg Foundation was established in 1930 to “help people help
themselves through the practical application of knowledge and resources
to improve their quality of life and that of future generations.”
Its programming activities center on the common vision of a world
in which each person has a sense of worth, and accepts responsibility
for self, family, community, and societal well being.
It is believed that each individual has the capacity to be
productive, and to help create nurturing families, responsive
institutions, and healthy communities. To
achieve the greatest impact, the Foundation targets its grants toward
specific focal points, or areas. These
include Food Systems and Rural Development; Youth and Education; Health;
and Philanthropy and Volunteerism.
When woven throughout these areas, funding is also provided for
leadership; information and communication technology; efforts to
capitalize on diversity; and family, neighborhood and community
development programming. Grants are concentrated in the United States, Latin America
and the Caribbean, and the southern African nations of Botswana,
Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Lesotho, Swaziland, and South Africa. For
more information about the Kellogg Foundation, please visit www.wkkf.org.
For more information about the Building Bridges Initiative,
please visit www.CenterPointInstitute.org/Bridges.
-30-
|
|
|